roslevi_65

You want a Britain that polices its borders, shrinks the fussier parts of the state, and stops apologising for itself — you think Islam needs reforming to integrate, that politicians dwell too much on the country's flaws, and that CANZUK beats Brussels. But this isn't pure free-market orthodoxy: you'd protect the triple lock, think the richest have too much of the pie, and want Shabana Mahmood gone from the left, not the right.

You split almost evenly with the national mood — siding with the majority on barely more than half your votes — which is telling in itself: you're not chasing consensus, you're voting your own ledger. Where Britain shrugged toward safe asylum routes or a climate taskforce, you said no; where the country worried about Reform, you didn't.

Hendon backs you almost every time — unanimous with you on Islam's reformation, CANZUK, minimum wage, farmer subsidies, the Green Party as a danger — a rare alignment for someone who breaks with the nation this often. The exceptions are pointed: on immigration and the NHS, on climate measures, on regional devolution, your patch went the other way with you, not against.

Foreign policy, justice, energy, transport, rights — you've never touched them, and for someone this decided on immigration and welfare, that's a real gap in the picture, not a footnote.

Eighteen scored votes is enough to see the shape of you, not the whole of you — cast a few more, especially on justice or rights, and this read gets sharper, not just longer. Every vote you make rewrites this profile; come back and see who you've become.