London accounts for around 13% of the UK population but generates over 20% of GDP and hosts most national media, financial services and political institutions. Successive governments have pursued devolution and levelling up programmes to shift power and investment northward, yet major decisions on transport, broadcasting and public spending remain concentrated in the capital.
There was no fracture to chase here, which is itself the story: from teenagers to pensioners, roughly three in four voters agreed the country tilts too far towards the capital. When a question usually so reliable for generating age wars — devolution, regional spending, the BBC's postcode — produces near-uniform agreement, that tells you something about how thoroughly the argument has already been won in public opinion, whatever governments have actually done about it.
The only wobble came from the 55-64s, who were markedly less convinced than everyone else either side of them, splitting six to nine rather than joining the rout. Men were somewhat firmer in their Yes than women, though both sides landed well clear of the halfway mark. Nobody, in short, mounted a serious defence of the status quo.
That the sentiment cuts so cleanly across demographics echoes a familiar frustration with Westminster, the Treasury and Broadcasting House all sitting within a few square miles of each other, no matter how many "levelling up" white papers have promised otherwise. The chamber's verdict suggests the geography of power in Britain remains, for most who bothered to vote, an open sore rather than a solved problem.
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
1 Opinion
Yes, but.... Regional devolution must be carefully managed to avoid divergence from national policy direction set by the central government but should be sufficiently funded to ensure efficient and effective local delivery.