RightsNational 19h 40m left
Should a person be lawfully free to refer to someone by their sex at birth rather than their stated gender identity?
No UK law makes misgendering a criminal offence, but the Equality Act 2010 lists gender reassignment as a protected characteristic, and unwanted conduct can amount to harassment at work or in services. In Forstater v CGD Europe (2021) the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that gender-critical beliefs are protected, while stating this does not allow holders to misgender trans people with impunity. In Mackereth v DWP (2022) a doctor who refused to use patients' pronouns lost his discrimination claim. The Supreme Court ruled in 2025 that sex in the Act means biological sex.
6 Opinions
Meant to vote yes but misclicked.
"There are no chicks with d*cks, only guys with t*ts" - Ted, 2015.
More education is needed to explain in clear terms about the X and Y chromosomes. It's not as simple as we brought up to believe. It would certainly help everyone to understand the complications that can arise with our genders. Most things are a huge learning curve over the centuries. What we thought, or were led to believe isn't necessarily true. Meantime, until we fully understand we should keep our thoughts to ourselves on the rights and wrongs of gender identity.
Whatever political philosophy one adopts, there must be a distinction between protecting people from harassment and compelling conformity of belief. People should be free to hold sincere views on contested questions, including views others find offensive or wrong. The proper boundary is threats, intimidation and harassment—not the mere expression of an unpopular belief.