Should Nigel Farage be investigated by the parliamentary standards commissioner over his meeting with the Bank of England governor?

A clear if not overwhelming verdict: 65% of the 31 who voted backed referring Nigel Farage to the standards commissioner over his Bank of England meeting, a 30-point margin that reads as a rebuke rather than a rout.

The generational pattern is the sharpest thing in the data. Every under-25 voter and three-quarters of 25-34s said yes, while the 55-64 group — the platform's largest bracket here, at 10 votes — split exactly down the middle, 5-5. Support cooled steadily with age until a late uptick among the small over-65 cohort.

Gender told a duller story: men and women landed within four points of each other, both comfortably yes, suggesting this was read less as a Farage-versus-establishment tribal fight and more as a straightforward question of parliamentary propriety and crypto-adjacent lobbying. That the split falls by age rather than by the usual Reform-versus-rest gender gulf hints voters were weighing conduct, not politics.

The 55-64 deadlock is the tell: even those most sympathetic to Farage's politics couldn't agree he was in the clear.