refnation
Should Quangos be scrapped?
GovernanceEnded 1 Sept

Should Quangos be scrapped?

Yes 78%No 22%497 votes cast

Over 300 arm's-length public bodies, commonly called quangos, manage around £350-390 billion in annual spending and employ nearly 400,000 staff. The current government under Prime Minister Keir Starmer is reviewing them all with a presumption toward closure, merger, or returning functions to ministerial departments to cut bureaucracy, save money, and restore elected accountability. Past efforts like the 2010 bonfire of the quangos reduced numbers but new ones have since been created, including in health, energy, and research.

Jump to opinions· 17

Voters here did not merely reject quangos; they treated them as a symptom of government ducking responsibility. Yes won nearly four to one, in a chamber where the case for central accountability was forceful, repetitive and almost entirely unopposed.

The floor’s most-respected Yes voice called quangos “unelected and often unaccountable bureaucrats”, while the highest-rated argument went further: “Yes, tired of the control they have.” Others attacked waste, red tape and what they saw as politicised bodies operating “without any responsibility”, with ministers expected to govern rather than hide behind arm’s-length decisions.

No voters left no argument at all, making the silence of the losing side part of the verdict. The debate’s sharper internal tension was on the Yes side: one voter proposed, “We should sat up a public body to look into this”, while another challenged the faith placed in Parliament, asking where MPs with “real life experience” were meant to come from.

That contradiction points to the wider issue: this was not simply a vote against public bodies, but against blurred lines of authority. The strongest recurring complaint was that “our politicians should start being accountable for, you know.... Politics?”, alongside darker claims that the system had become a refuge for vested interests, senior salaries and decisions nobody quite owned.

The room’s answer was blunt: fewer centres of power, clearer ministerial responsibility, and no more institutional places to hide.

“Yes, tired of the control they have. It should be government who make and act. Tony Blair destroyed the UK 20 years ago with these quangos”

YES case · Lixhul · 7 respects

78%
Yes
majority
22% No
Votes497
Skipped16
You—

% voting yes, by leaning

21% yes among H. Left voters, 19 of them
51% yes among Left voters, 69 of them
63% yes among C. Left voters, 49 of them
75% yes among Centre voters, 52 of them
79% yes among C. Right voters, 70 of them
93% yes among Right voters, 215 of them
100% yes among H. Right voters, 42 of them
H. Left
Left
C. Left
Centre
C. Right
Right
H. Right
Cite this result

refnation referendum, closed 1 September 2026: “Should Quangos be scrapped?” — Yes 78% (497 votes).

Free to quote with a link to this page — Copy includes it.

LeftCentreRight
Spread the wordShare
Debate

17 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
Lixhul· 834
Omnislash
Voted yesRight lean

Yes, tired of the control they have. It should be government who make and act. Tony Blair destroyed the UK 20 years ago with these quangos

JohnnyBoy· 495
The Housing Sovereigntist
Voted yesRight lean

Vested interests always prevent any serious change with spurious arguments once they gain power. The only issue is accountability which our civil servants hate & our politicians love obscuring what they are actually doing. Parliament needs strong independent MPs who are talented & patriotic & able to properly bring the govt to account. Also there must be serious sanctions for Ministers & Civil Servants who works against our interests.

The Sovereignty Custodian
Voted yesH. Right lean

Quangos are a major problem today. Unelected and often unaccountable bureaucrats. Starkey makes a strong case for their abolition as an urgent necessity if we are to have any hope of national recovery.

Geedon· 168
The All-Rounder
Voted yesRight lean

We have been funnelling money into these waste of space for decades! We were running the empire with barely 5,000 people, using pen and paper, yet with computers and AI the modern UK Civil Service employs 557,825 people! It’s joke at every hard workers expense!

The Energy-Security Right
Voted yesRight lean

Arm's length was supposed to mean better less politicised decision making. But now bizarre political activism is inside every one of them and they seem to think they answer to nobody.

Ferris· 136
The Redistributionist Right
Voted yesC. Right lean

Yes, these unelected organisations have to much power and influence, and not enough accountability. A lot like politicians, I suppose…

Slawomir· 901
The Accountable Capitalist
Voted yesRight lean

Time to cut down public sector, especially when it acts without any responsibility. Money is short, we shouldn't multiply decision centres. Government is here to govern and take full responsibility for results.

BenL· 441
The Revered
Voted yesC. Left lean

I don't see how you can hold so many of these orgs accountable for their spending / budgets it's completely watering down our budgets and allowing more and more red tape to hide behind. Wild idea but maybe our politicians should start being accountable for, you know.... Politics?

The Left Constitutionalist
Voted yesC. Left lean

They should be run by government ministers. They should be part of an English parliament.

Glasses· 731
The Atlantic Gatekeeper
Voted yesRight lean

We should sat up a public body to look into this .!