REFNATION
Should the UK suspend foreign aid to countries with the death penalty?
Foreign PolicyEnds 2 Oct 23h 2m left

Should the UK suspend foreign aid to countries with the death penalty?

The UK opposes the death penalty in all circumstances as a matter of principle and regularly raises concerns with retentionist states through diplomacy. In 2025 the UK provided bilateral ODA to 118 countries, including retentionist ones such as Yemen, Afghanistan and Pakistan, where executions occur. Global executions reached the highest level in decades in 2025, with over 2,700 carried out, mainly in a small number of countries, many of which receive international aid.

Jump to opinions· 5
Cast your vote32 votes so far

Vote to unlock the result — plus the full breakdown by age, gender, constituency and political leaning.

DocketAlso on today's ballot
Debate

5 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
SimonD· 51
The Electoral Traditionalist
Voted noC. Right lean

As with several other questions, I am suspicious of these kind of absolutist rules. Human rights should be a major part of our criteria for aid, but why should the death penalty be a overriding red line, as opposed to women's rights for example? Let's be a bit more considered and less concerned about simplistic virtue signalling.

Bauhaus· 15
Voted yesC. Left lean

This is a simple yes for me, we cannot aid societies that refuse to honour the human rights to not be murdered by capital action. Capital action is the moral responsibility of every single citizen of a nation-state, and this nation has decided it is unethical, immoral and irreconcilable. Britain should divest itself of all aid to oligarchies, dictatorships, draconian states, kakistocracies, skelarchies and despotates, including sanctions against those arming such states.

Dragontao· 391
The Atlantic Custodian
Voted noC. Right lean

Foreign aid needs to be reduced for many reasons. Not this specifically, so I voted no. Personally, I support the death penalty for certain crimes, as long as evidence is incontrovertible. Such as the likes of Axel Rudakubana. That may upset a few delicate sensibilities, but if you don't respect the basic right of life of someone else, why should yours be respected. Failing that, life sentences must mean life. Not out in 15 years for murder.

Slawomir· 829
The Accountable Capitalist
Voted yesRight lean

Yes, and all other as well.

teuchter· 103
The Small-State Fiscalist
Voted yesH. Right lean

I voted yes, but only in the context of stopping foreign aid as a whole. At the very least we should have a moratorium on all foreign aid and only extend aid to territories where we can confirm the money goes where we have directed it to. Other than emergency situations such as natural disasters, foreign aid should never come before a domestic need for money.