The advice to stock three days of food and water won comfortably, but the Yes case came laced with complaints about how the government delivered it. One Yes voter called the guidance sound while saying the framing "lacked clarity" and triggered panic buying; another found it "strange the way it was done".
The most-respected Yes case was a call to go further: teach people resilience rather than rely on a single scare. Elsewhere Yes voters pointed to storms and burst mains, and to other governments issuing the same guidance. One put it bluntly: “Preparedness is not paranoia; it is basic resilience.”
The most-respected No case was a suspicious question, “Who are they planning on going to war with?”, and the No side mostly ran on mistrust of the messenger. Several called it fear-mongering, with one voter writing “Totally unnecessary fear-mongering”. Others turned to the state's own readiness: if the threat were real, one said, the government would be "doing something about the armed forces".
That last point was not confined to No. A Yes voter asked what the government's own level of readiness is, and wanted evidence that infrastructure providers are prepared, not just instructions to stock up. Both sides circled the grid, defence spending and the state's own preparedness; they split on whether the advice was prudence or alarm.
So the verdict endorses the shopping list, while voters on both sides kept asking what the government itself is doing to keep the lights on.
103 Opinions
They should go further and teach people how to have resilience rather than a single scaremongering event.
Our government is falling in line with the maniac elites behind Agenda 2030. They've got something in store for us along the lines of the Covid lockdowns, which was also internationally orchestrated. I'm all for being prepared, but it makes me very nervous when governments who have poked the Russian bear, depleated our armed forces and destableised our infrastructure are telling us to buckle up. We're in for a rough ride
Who are they planning on going to war with? The Britons appear to be the only ones this government and establishment seem to hate.
Scaremondering & shows how much the infrastructure in the BNation has been hollowed out ocer the decade.
Definitely, even though I suspect most already have 3 days worth of supplies. I also think 3 days is not long enough. Come a bad winter you could be cut off for weeks, not days. Not just snow, but ice, too dangerous to drive on in some areas. Bet you're all thinking WW3, whatever the reason for a collection of food supplies, you never know what disaster is waiting in the future.
TTheir guidance was sound, yet the framing lacked clarity and triggered panic buying in multiple regions. This also promoted numerous mistaken beliefs across the country and elsewhere.
Look it seems sensible & most will probably have that stock. First most people will ignore it, second some may not have the space but finally the reason they make these pronouncements is that due solely to the Net Zero scam & successive governments serial under funding (that’s nationalisation for you ) of the Grid they know we will soon have Labour sponsored black outs. To me this is pre- meditated & they should be criminally liable for spoiled food when fridges lose power.
Not against people being prepared but the Governments, this and previous, desire to constantly instill fear in the population is ridiculous. Like the emergency alert about fires. Madness and over reach.
Just days after the Govt reminder we saw thousands without power due to storms. Most other governments from Europe to Japan issue the same guidance. AI has the potential to shut down power and water.
I don't believe this govt, or the last. This is about mismanagement of our power supply network. Milliband ought to be in prison