MerthyrKitt

You vote for a more sovereign, orderly UK: tighter borders, fewer concessions to religious or gender politics, firmer welfare rules and a state confident enough to defend its own interests. Your defining instinct is not simply “right-wing”; it is resistance to outside pressure and fashionable orthodoxies — from replacing the Refugee Convention to defending sex-based language and Palestine Action’s proscription.

You were The Bunker Hawk; you have become The Sovereignty Hardliner. Defence still matters, but the newer record sharpens your signature around rights, immigration and national control, while welfare has settled into a clear rightward position and housing has moved further right. You remain capable of dissent: you opposed extra punishment for litterers and rejected automatic MP disqualification for any criminal conviction.

You usually travel with the national majority, but your politics are harder-edged than that statistic suggests: you back inheritance-tax abolition, tighter PIP and asylum rules, and oppose universal basic income even when the question divides the country. The UK often agrees with your conclusions; you are less interested in making them sound polite.

Your Centre-Left circle is a loose coalition rather than a home. Slawomir is your natural ally — especially on immigration and health — while TheBlackCat is your sharpest clash, particularly over housing; overall, you agree with your follows only somewhat more often than not.

This read finally has the whole record behind it; the open question is whether your welfare hard line survives the next practical, delivery-focused vote. Ten more votes will refresh the portrait, and each one will make the tension between sovereign control and occasional fairness-minded dissent harder to miss.

Defence, immigration and energy are where you never waver — more warheads, more North Sea licences, fewer arrivals, no exceptions. This isn't reflexive Toryism; you'll break for care workers' pay and social housing funding when the state actually delivers, but the border and the barracks come first.

You were the Fortress Realist, hard on welfare and housing with odd left flashes. That's still true, but defence has hardened into a second anchor exactly as flagged — from the £15bn uplift to nuclear capability to keeping Ukraine's gun barrels flowing, you're now armoured on two fronts, not one.

You split with the country almost exactly down the middle — with it on deportations and NHS reform, against it on scrapping the two-child cap, banning extremist parties, and abolishing the GLA, where the nation hesitates and you don't.

Your crowd leans centre-left and you still hit 80% lockstep with Slawomir on constitution and environment — proof this isn't tribal reflex, it's genuine overlap on sovereignty. JenJennn is the opposite story: you share governance instincts but split hard on rights, the fault line that actually defines you.

This read sharpens with every vote — next week, watch whether your welfare hard line survives contact with another Fair Pay-style test, because that's the thread still open.

You want a Britain that builds less on the greenbelt but more council homes on brownfield, that arms itself without leaning on NATO, and that stops treating PIP as a rubber stamp — order and self-reliance, not sentiment, is the throughline.

Last week you were the Landlord's Guardian, defined almost entirely by housing instincts. You've widened out since — defence has hardened into a genuine conviction (nuclear expansion, Falklands force, NATO scepticism), while housing has sharpened rather than softened: judicial review limits, no council-home redirection, yes to greenbelt building.

You split almost evenly with the national mood — nine of fifteen recent votes landed with the majority — but your dissents are pointed: you rejected the meningitis B vaccine rollout, the climate briefing, and regional devolution, all comfortable national yeses.

No local data has landed for you yet, so there's no town to measure yourself against — an open thread for the weeks ahead.

You've never voted on education, employment, business, or technology — for someone this decided on welfare and housing, the absence of a view on jobs and schooling is a real hole. Cast a few more votes and this picture stops being early days — every vote you add makes next week's read sharper and truer.

You want a Britain where property stays private, work stays checked, and the police get the tools to stop the drift — no rent controls, no forced Decent Homes upgrades, no wealth tax on the successful. It's a settled, propertied conservatism: tough on disorder, allergic to redistribution, sceptical of any scheme that asks the state to do more with other people's money.

You're usually in the room's majority — on gig-economy checks, on antisocial behaviour powers, on facial recognition safeguards — but on housing you're the outlier: the country voted for rent controls and a National Care Service, you voted NO to both, and on the 2% wealth tax you sided with a nation that unanimously agreed with you. That last one shows a Britain further right than people assume, and you found it.

No local data yet on any of your votes — your area hasn't caught up with you. That's a gap this profile will close as your neighbours start voting alongside you.

Ten votes in and you've never touched Health, Defence, Education, Energy or a dozen other categories — for someone this decided on housing and welfare, that's a lot of Britain still unspoken for. Justice and immigration show you at your firmest; filling in Health or Education next would tell us whether that firmness runs right through, or softens somewhere.

Early days, but the shape is already sharp: property-first, order-first, wary of the state's wallet. Cast a few more votes and this profile gets truer every week — right now it's a strong sketch, not yet the full portrait.