bob

Your scored votes tell a clear story: state builds houses when the market won't, business gets no free pass on captive insurance or green levy shifts, and you'd rather Britain rejoined the EU than kept drifting. This is a Britain where the state does the heavy lifting and business pays its share — but it's not a purist's Britain.

You split almost exactly down the middle with the national mood — siding with the majority on half your votes, against it on the rest. Where you diverge, it's not timid: you backed a state-owned housebuilder while most of the country shrugged, and you gave Starmer a good report card when seven in ten voters didn't.

Here's the seasoning: you want immigration "significantly reduced" and you'd scrap 2050 net zero — both hard-right positions, both voted alongside crowds that skew right — while everywhere else you're voting like a committed statist. That's not incoherence; it's a voter who doesn't outsource their views to a party rulebook.

You've never voted on welfare, defence, justice, or education — big gaps in a profile that otherwise reads decisively. Six scored votes is early days; the shape is visible, but it's a sketch, not a portrait yet.

Every vote you cast sharpens this — cast a few in welfare or justice and we'll see whether that collectivist instinct holds, or whether the same guarded streak that broke right on immigration shows up there too. Come back next week; the picture only gets truer.