Are there too many sex scenes on programmes?

The most striking thing about this vote is the age gradient running almost the wrong way round from the stereotype: it was the youngest voters, not the oldest, who were most relaxed about explicit content, with barely a murmur of complaint from the under-25s, while unease crept in among those in their fifties and sixties before easing off again among the over-65s. That non-linear shape suggests this isn't really a generational culture war so much as a viewing-habits one, streaming natives shrugging off what older, more channel-hopping viewers still find jarring.

The sharper divide was between men and women. Men dismissed the "too many sex scenes" complaint comprehensively, while the smaller cohort of women who voted came down heavily the other way, suggesting a real gap in how graphic content lands depending on who's watching and, perhaps, whose comfort is assumed by writers' rooms when a scene gets written in.

The result sits inside a familiar fault line in British broadcasting debates, the tension between prestige-drama ambition and family-viewing sensibility that has trailed everything from Sunday-night costume drama to the watershed rules themselves. Streaming's borderless, binge-friendly delivery has only sharpened that argument, since there's no 9pm cut-off to police what autoplay serves up next.

Little floor debate was recorded, but the one voice the chamber elevated, on the No side, kept it simple: "Art is art" — a shrug that, going by the numbers, most of the room was inclined to share.

The upshot: a comfortable no, but one with a fault line running straight down the middle of the sofa.