The generation most steeped in algorithmic politics turned out to be the least convinced by the thesis. Voters in their mid-thirties to mid-forties split down the middle on whether US-style partisan tribalism has colonised Westminster, even as the rest of the chamber, from the youngest to the oldest, answered yes with real conviction, the over-65s unanimously so.
That fracture sits oddly against the received story, that it's the young who've absorbed American culture-war categories through social media. Here it was the 55-64s and 25-34s, not the middle-aged, who voted most heavily that polarisation has crossed the Atlantic, while men were notably more convinced than women, who arrived at yes by a narrower margin.
The result lands squarely on a live fault line: Brexit's realignment of politics around identity rather than class, the reflex import of American language on race and gender, and worries that first-past-the-post and a fracturing multi-party system leave Britain more vulnerable to tribal sorting than its institutions were built for.
That the doubters cluster in a single age band, rather than across a clean generational line, suggests this isn't simply a story about who grew up online.
2 Opinions
Social media coupled with anonymous foreign influence has created polarising echo chambers, making debates harder to have and measured thoughts scarcer to come by. The divide has always been there, but is now amplified, as most cases on SM.