Yes carried the day, 63% to 37%, on a modest 27-vote turnout — the kind of contract nobody marches over, and the result reflects that: a solid working majority rather than a rout, for kitting out special forces with off-the-shelf pickups rather than bespoke armour.
The real split ran on gender, not age. Men backed the purchase 9 to 4 (69%), while women broke the other way, 6 against to 4 for (40% yes) — a reversal striking enough to be the story of this vote, on a question with no obvious partisan hook.
Age offered a hint of the same pattern at the youngest end: 16-24s were the only age band to reject the idea outright, 4 no to 3 yes, before support climbed steadily through the 25-34 bracket (63% yes, the largest single group) and beyond. It reads less like a defence-spending debate and more like the instinctive divide that shows up whenever a military hardware question meets a mixed electorate — value-for-money pragmatism against a wariness of buying more kit at all.
For £19.7m and 270 pickup trucks, this vote generated more disagreement between men and women than most questions about actual British Army doctrine ever do.
0 Opinions
Weigh in on the debate.