Ueva

You're a state-builder at heart — a National Care Service funded by general taxation, a universal basic income, a baby trust fund, more social housing money — but you're no reflexive leftist: you voted against expanding council housing and against Lewisham blocking Home Office cooperation. Your Britain has a thick safety net woven from a strong centre, not from local resistance to it.

You're often out of step with the country's instincts, not its outcomes: you rejected the ECHR exit, the net zero scrap, and reducing immigration when large majorities backed each — yet on care funding, devolution and the pension value-for-money framework you rode with big national majorities. You're a left-leaner who trusts institutions Britain wants to smash.

Bath backs you almost unanimously — on the monarchy, devolution, UBI, cannabis, council housing, immigration, ECHR, all of it your area moved in lockstep with you. It's a rare thing: a local mandate this clean, though it also means you've never really been tested against your neighbours.

Only eight of your twenty votes carry a political signal, and huge swathes — health, justice, defence, energy, crime — remain untouched. Right now you're a clear Centre-Left voice built almost entirely on welfare and housing; everything else is still a sketch.

This is early days — a strong, honest shape rather than a finished picture. Cast a few votes on justice or immigration policy specifically and we'll see whether your welfare conviction holds when the subject turns harder; the profile gets sharper, and truer, with every vote you cast.