Should the UK ban social media for children under 16?
RightsEnded 23 Jul

Should the UK ban social media for children under 16?

Yes 46%No 54%128 votes cast

Australia has passed the world's first law banning social media for children under 16 from late 2025, with fines up to $34.4 million for violations. France, Austria, Canada and Denmark are advancing similar age-based restrictions or digital safety laws. Critics including Amnesty Tech argue the bans ignore children's real habits and technology needs while raising privacy concerns.

Sourcezamin.uz
Jump to opinions· 4

What's striking about this vote is how flat the age curve is on a question that looks, on its face, like a generational fight. From the youngest voters to the oldest, support for a ban hovered in a tight band either side of the result's overall 46%, with only the 55-64s breaking meaningfully in favour and the over-65s among the most sceptical of all — hardly the pattern you'd expect if this were really about parents versus teenagers.

The sharper line runs through gender: men here split down the middle, while women who voted leaned clearly towards No, a divide that cuts against the instinct that restricting children's online lives is primarily a mothers' cause. If anything it suggests the practical case against a ban — that it can't be policed — landed harder with women in this sample than the protective case landed with anyone.

The vote lands the UK squarely inside a fight now playing out from Canberra to Paris, where lawmakers are testing whether platforms, not parents, should carry the burden of age-gating the internet, and where critics warn such laws misjudge how children actually use technology. Britain's own age-verification experiments around online pornography hover in the background as a cautionary tale of good intentions meeting determined teenagers.

That tale showed up directly in the debate: the floor's respected No case, from "Minfyourbuisness", recounted a son who "took him two minutes to download a free VPN" to beat the UK's existing age checks, while the chamber's leading Yes voice, "Glasses", pressed a different enforcement worry entirely, joking the UK should "ban it for adults who think holding magic phone, whilst crossing roads, makes them invincible." Between a joke about grown-up distraction and a demonstration of teenage ingenuity, the practical objection won out.

A ban that Australia is enforcing with nine-figure fines couldn't win a majority here on the simple suspicion that no fine would actually stop a determined fifteen-year-old.

“Should ban it for adults who think holding magic phone ,whilst crossing roads ,makes them invincible!!”

YES case · Glasses · 1 respect

“Simply because the ban would be pointless... The vast majority of 16yr olds will use technology to bypass the ban within a couple of minutes! When they brought in the age restrictions around porn in the UK my son (an IT tech for a major company) explained why it was pointless. He then demonstrated .. Took him two minutes to download a free VPN which by-passed the UK age checking systems by usin”

NO case · JustFactsNotBeliefs · 2 respects

54%
No
majority
46% Yes
Votes128
Skipped3
You—

% voting yes, by leaning

40% yes among H. Left voters, 10 of them
65% yes among Left voters, 26 of them
56% yes among C. Left voters, 16 of them
56% yes among Centre voters, 16 of them
47% yes among C. Right voters, 15 of them
29% yes among Right voters, 35 of them
33% yes among H. Right voters, 6 of them
H. Left
Left
C. Left
Centre
C. Right
Right
H. Right
Cite this result

refnation referendum, closed 23 July 2026: “Should the UK ban social media for children under 16?” — No 54% (128 votes).

Free to quote with a link to this page — Copy includes it.

Spread the wordShare
Debate

4 Opinions

Sign in and vote to share your opinion.
The Peacemaker
Voted noC. Left lean

Simply because the ban would be pointless... The vast majority of 16yr olds will use technology to bypass the ban within a couple of minutes! When they brought in the age restrictions around porn in the UK my son (an IT tech for a major company) explained why it was pointless. He then demonstrated .. Took him two minutes to download a free VPN which by-passed the UK age checking systems by using a server in Holland. (No I don't know what all that means either)

The Ironclad Civic Paternalist
Voted yesCentre lean

I have seen first hand what social media does with my own eyes. You get given a phone number, so use it! If you want to see pictures of your friends, guess what go see them and make a memory, not via a screen but in the actual real world

Glasses· 794
The Command-and-Control Right
Voted yesRight lean

Should ban it for adults who think holding magic phone ,whilst crossing roads ,makes them invincible!!