Verdicts

The verdict

A dead-heat, 13-13, on whether Whitehall should probe JD.com's Joybuy expansion — and the only bloc with real numbers, 25-34s, split exactly down the middle too, 6-6.

The verdict

A near dead heat on devolution, 17 votes to 16, but the closeness masks a sharp gender split: men backed the shift to the regions 60-40, women rejected it nearly two to one.

The verdict

Yes squeaked it, 15 votes to 14, on a question that split almost every group down the middle except one: the youngest voters, who broke decisively for handing Whitehall's power to Burnham.

The verdict

Voters rejected Ed Miliband for chancellor by four to one, but the headline number hides a sharp gender split: women were split down the middle while men voted 14 to 1 against.

The verdict

A landslide for higher defence spending, with 18 of 21 voters here backing the "Moscow test" — but the dissent that did surface clustered among younger women and 25-34s, not the retired.

The verdict

Yes carried it 55-45 on a knife-edge 64-vote chamber, but the real split was age, not gender — and it ran backwards from what 2016 nostalgia would predict, with the young most hostile to Brexit and the over-65s unanimous against.

The verdict

A 10-point win for No that conceals a stark gender split: men backed the AI levy 59-41, women rejected it 82-18 — the widest gulf on the board.

The verdict

No, subscriptions live on — the chamber rejected the "dead" verdict 21-17, a narrow-ish call that masks a sharp generational split: under-25s said yes by two to one, while the 25-44 bracket, presumably the ones actually juggling five direct debits, said emphatically no.

The verdict

No, by a whisker: 30 votes to 27 out of 57 kept the "communism" charge alive, but the closeness masks a sharp generational split — under-25s backed the comparison 11-4, older voters mostly rejected it.

The verdict

Andy Burnham's prospective premiership was rejected 31-24, a 12-point margin that flattered him less than the topline suggests: it was the platform's 25-34s, not any Tory-leaning older cohort, who did most of the sinking, going 35% yes against a youth vote that actually backed him.

The verdict

A narrow YES, 54-46, on Farage's role in toppling four PMs — but the topline masks a stark generational split: the youngest voters rejected the claim by nearly four to one, while those in their thirties and forties overwhelmingly endorsed it.

The verdict

Yes carried every age band bar the tiny over-65 cohort, and by a comfortable 72-28 overall — a chamber with little patience for a Prime Minister clinging on after a by-election mauling and a 100-MP revolt.

The verdict

Yes narrowly carries the day on Starmer's legacy, 28 to 25, but the chamber is really two votes in one: women backed him decisively while men were split down the middle.

The verdict

Yes squeaked home, 27 to 25, but the chamber split cleanly by gender: men backed the idea that Burnham would be worse by two to one, women leaned the other way.

The verdict

Voters here declared Britain ungovernable by 58 to 42, a clear but not crushing verdict, carried above all by the 25-34s who made up more than half the chamber and split 57% yes.

The verdict

Yes carried the chamber 59-41, but the real split ran along gender lines, not age: women backed a mandatory election by 78%, men split dead even at 50-50.

The verdict

Voters here delivered Starmer a 63-37 verdict for resignation, a comfortable rather than crushing margin, with the weight of the vote coming from the platform's dominant 25-34 bracket.

The verdict

A climate security taskforce scraped through, 7 votes to 6, on a chamber too small to call anything but a coin toss with a distinct wobble.

The verdict

Narrow defeat for the sponsored-refugee model: No edges it 6-5, with a chamber this small hinging on a single vote.

The verdict

No won a narrow contest of 11 votes, 6 to 5, on whether Westminster should do more to shield people from extreme heat — a margin thin enough that this reads less like a verdict than a shrug.

The verdict

No won it, 16 votes to 10, but the headline hides a striking generational split: the 25-34s broke hardest against, 9 of 11, while the thin band of 35-44s went the other way, 4 of 6 for Yes.

The verdict

No, by a clear 24-point margin, kept Shabana Mahmood in post — but the story is the 25-34s, who voted 7 to 1 against removing her, the most one-sided reading of any group in the chamber.

The verdict

No won it, 12-7, on a small chamber of just 19 registered voters — a clear if hardly overwhelming rejection of the status quo Andy Burnham now says he'd preserve.

The verdict

NO carried a comfortable 19-9 win, with the platform's largest cohort, 25-34s, rejecting a permanent moratorium 10-5 and men breaking against it far harder than women.