Verdicts

The verdict

YES carried the chamber 65-35, but the closest thing to a clean vote came from 35-44 year-olds, who split 8-0 — the only age band unanimous, and pointedly not the young people the question is actually about.

The verdict

Yes carried the chamber 67-33, but the real split ran along gender lines rather than age: men backed British cement by 78% while women were essentially tied, 12-13.

The verdict

Voters here backed scrapping the triple lock 61-39, but the topline hides a generational cliff: 90% of 25-34s (18 of 20) wanted it gone, while every 45-54-year-old who voted (4 of 4) said keep it.

The verdict

Voters called the Green Party a danger to British society by 64% to 36%, with women (73% yes) far more convinced than men, who split almost evenly.

The verdict

No won it, 33 to 21, but the age lines don't march in step: the 25-34 bloc (n=23) split 39% yes while the smaller 35-44 group ran 63% yes, no tidy generational story here.

The verdict

Yes carried the chamber by 38 points, but the 45-54s were the one bloc to break the other way, voting 3-1 against efficiency-linked farm subsidies.

The verdict

Yes carried the day, 27 to 22, but the closest thing to a consensus came from the 25-34 bracket, which broke 64% yes on the platform's largest single group of voters.

The verdict

Yes carried the chamber comfortably, 73 to 27, with the only pocket of real resistance among 35-44s, who were the sole age group to lean No.

The verdict

A near dead heat on the union itself, decided by a single vote — 17 to 16 — with the sharpest split not between nations but generations: the 55-64s broke overwhelmingly for "yes" while every other age band split down the middle or against.

The verdict

Yes carried the day 20-15, but the only age group with real weight, the 25-34s, did the heavy lifting: 11 of their 17 votes backed devolution, while the older cohorts leaned no.

The verdict

Yes carried the chamber 21-9, but the real story is the 25-34 bloc, which supplied half the vote and backed reform 12-3, while 35-44-year-olds broke sharply the other way.

The verdict

A narrow defeat rather than a rout: No edged it 17-14, with the only large enough group to read, 25-34, split dead evenly down the middle.

The verdict

No, the minimum wage does not strangle job creation, voters here decided, by 19 to 13 — a clear but not crushing verdict, with men far more sceptical of the wage floor than the small number of women who voted.

The verdict

A landslide for CANZUK: 23 of 28 voters backed pursuing the federation, an 82% share and a 64-point margin that left only five dissenters scattered across the age range.

The verdict

Yes carried the chamber comfortably, 22 to 9, with the only real resistance clustered among men, where roughly two in five still voted no.

The verdict

Voters backed more state investment in subsea cable skills 28-9, but the consensus was generational: everyone over 35 who voted said yes, while under-35s split almost down the middle.

The verdict

A modest 60% majority backed capping Flood Re payouts for the wealthiest, but the chamber split cleanly by generation — younger and older voters keen to rein in subsidy for mansion-band homes, the 45-54s unanimously against.

The verdict

Yes carried the chamber 59-41, but the young were unanimous against it and the middle-aged unanimous for it, a generational split unusually clean for an issue framed as historical redress.

The verdict

A comfortable but not overwhelming win for an apology to forced-adoption mothers, 62-38, with the clearest support coming from the 25-44 bracket rather than the young or old.

The verdict

Yes to a Hybrid Navy carried 62-38, but that headline hides a chamber split almost clean in half by demography: men backed it 3 to 1, women rejected it 4 to 1.

The verdict

A narrow-ish win for cutting consultancy contracts masks a sharp generational split: the youngest voters were the only cohort to back the consultants, while every older bracket swung firmly the other way.

The verdict

A modest but clear win for the pay rise, 21-13, with the only real fracture running along age lines rather than gender.

The verdict

A narrow-ish win for Yes masks a sharp fracture: every under-25 who voted said no, while men backed the shortfall claim by more than two to one and women split against it.

The verdict

A near dead heat, with No edging it 18-17 out of 35 — the platform essentially split down the middle on whether Burnham should go populist on the cost of living, though women broke more sceptical (33% yes) than men (47%).