Verdicts

The verdict

On a question that fused counter-terrorism with antisemitism, the chamber found rare consensus: banning the IRGC and its UK proxy passed by nearly three to one, with every generation and both sexes landing on the same side.

The verdict

The chamber backed Trump's demand for a sharper NATO spending push by two to one, but the enthusiasm rose steadily with age — a split that reads less like partisanship than like who remembers what deterrence used to cost.

The verdict

A modest yes conceals a chamber that could barely agree with itself: strip out the two ends of the age range and the middle years split almost precisely down the middle on whether rent controls would help.

The verdict

Not since the debates over the 2016 vote has a “compassion” question split so cleanly along the middle of working-age Britain rather than along the usual left-right lines, and here it produced a clear rejection of reopening the family reunion route, by 40 votes to 23.

The verdict

When a question about a specific, notorious offender produces near-unanimous agreement across every age group and both sexes, the vote isn't really about him at all — it's a verdict on the law itself, and here that verdict came in at better than five to one.

The verdict

A dead-heat headline masks a real fracture: women backed the funding by a landslide while men split against it, and the middle-aged 35-44 bloc stood out as the sharpest holdouts.

The verdict

A vote this evenly split on whether Farage has actually gone anywhere is itself the verdict: by 50 to 48, the chamber decided the Clacton resignation was theatre, not departure.

The verdict

Younger voters weren't so sure Farage would hold his own seat, even as the chamber backed him to do it by a comfortable if unspectacular margin.

The verdict

Rare is the referendum where the generations agree, but here they nearly did: three in four voters backed May's 10-year NHS integration plan, with only the mildest of wobbles as the age brackets climbed.

The verdict

A near-perfect coin toss on English devolution masks a real generational fracture: the under-35s backed Andy Burnham's regionalist push two to one, while every older bracket from 35 upward leaned against it.

The verdict

The one bloc that voted with a single voice was the one furthest from student politics: every one of the 55-64s backed a Hillsborough law, in a vote where support was strong everywhere but never quite unanimous elsewhere.

The verdict

Middle age settled this one: voters in their forties and fifties backed the practicality of the car almost unanimously, while the 25-34s alone split down the middle, leaving the chamber's verdict at 72% yes.

The verdict

There is a bleak irony in a question about voter competence being answered, three to one, with a vote of no confidence in the voter — the public's own verdict on itself was damning, and it hardened with age.

The verdict

The generational pattern is almost too neat to be coincidence: enthusiasm for HS2 borrowing Japan's engineering falls in near-lockstep with age, from the young nearly unanimous to the oldest split down the middle, as voters backed the Shinkansen pivot two to one.

The verdict

Two to one against extending free childcare to parents on benefits, but the real split was generational: the youngest voters backed the idea, the middle-aged rejected it almost outright, and the chamber only came together once it went past 65.

The verdict

A dip in the middle of the age range, not the ends, decided this: the 35-54s—presumably the ones actually navigating local plans and school catchments—turned against joint strategies that voters either side of them, younger and older, waved through, as England backed mandatory cross-council planning 56-44.

The verdict

A near-perfect tie on planning reform ended in NO by a single vote, but the real split was generational: every under-25 backed the strategies, while 35-44s rejected them almost nine to one.

The verdict

Britain's appetite for punishing broken promises turns out to have little to do with age and quite a lot to do with gender: two to one for criminalising failed manifesto pledges overall, but women backed it almost unanimously while men were closer to a coin toss.

The verdict

A ban on offshore casino sponsorships carried comfortably, but the sharpest line in the chamber wasn't age, it was gender — men backed it roughly two to one while women were narrowly against.

The verdict

On a question this close, the generations split hardest: young voters overwhelmingly rejected smoothing the benefit cliff edge, while those in their prime working years backed it strongly enough to carry Yes to a narrow national win.

The verdict

A vote to scrap net zero by 2050 carried almost three to one, and the scepticism ran flat across every age band, undercutting the usual script of young idealists versus older sceptics.

The verdict

The rare vote where Britain's fault lines simply refused to show up: no age split, no gender split, just a near-unanimous rejection of the WEF's rent-everything future, as No swept to a 74-point margin.

The verdict

A cap that unions can sidestep at scale still won comfortably among the under-45s but ran aground with the 55-64s, who alone voted it down, splitting a modest 58% Yes with a sharp generational fault line.

The verdict

Rarely does an NHS spending plan unite the generations, but here the 65s-and-over — presumably the group with most at stake in crumbling wards and delayed care — were unanimous, while every other age band still backed the plan comfortably.