Verdicts

The verdict

Yes scraped home by four points, but the real story is age, not devolution economics: 25-34s backed it 61-39 while the 55-64s rejected it 33-67, a near mirror image within the same 75-vote chamber.

The verdict

Yes carried the chamber by 50 points, but the age data tells a stranger story than a simple verdict on Thatcherism: the 25-34s were unanimous, the 55-64s — old enough to remember the pit closures firsthand — were the only age group to say no.

The verdict

Yes carried the vote comfortably, but the coalition behind it was starkly generational and gendered — near-unanimous among the middle-aged and male, split down the middle among women.

The verdict

No to the mansion tax, but narrowly — 31 to 25 — with the closeness masking a sharp generational split: 25-34s rejected it 8-14 while 45-54s backed it 6-1.

The verdict

Yes squeaked through nationally, but the chamber split hard by gender — men backed the whole-systems approach by more than two to one, women rejected it by nearly the same margin.

The verdict

Yes carried the day, 61 to 39, but the 35-44s bucked the trend hard — just 1 of 5 backed protecting UKRI's international standing, the only age group to break decisively against.

The verdict

Voters narrowly declined to write off Farage, but only just — No edged it 39-32, with the sharpest resistance coming from the middle-aged, not the young.

The verdict

Yes narrowly carries the vote, but the real story is generational: under-35s broke decisively for Yes while the 35-54 middle-aged cohort swung the other way entirely.

The verdict

Yes carried it comfortably, 66 to 34, with support holding remarkably steady across every age band from twentysomethings to pensioners rather than fracturing along generational lines.

The verdict

Yes carried the day 69-31 on planning overhaul, but the chamber split hard by gender: men backed it 73%, women rejected it 64%, a 37-point gulf hiding inside the headline landslide.

The verdict

Yes carried the chamber by 26 points, but the coalition behind it was younger and more male than the result suggests — 25-34s voted three-to-one for a probe while women split against it.

The verdict

Voters here rejected fast-tracking data centres through the NSIP regime, 26 to 17, but the topline hides a stark gender gulf: men split almost evenly while women opposed it by 8 to 1.

The verdict

A decisive 80% Yes, but the enthusiasm cooled steadily with age and split sharply by gender, with women on the platform tied 3-3 while men backed the reform 28-5.

The verdict

No to Miliband as Burnham's chancellor, by two to one — but the chamber split hard by both age and sex, with women backing him 73% to men's 27%.

The verdict

A narrow-ish national win for looser gilt rules masks a sharp generational split: under-45s backed the tweak by wide margins, over-45s turned against it almost as decisively.

The verdict

A landslide: 84% of the chamber backed tightening the rules on overseas political donations, with only 9 dissenters out of 58 across every age group and both sexes.

The verdict

Yes carried the vote 59-41, but the chamber split hard by gender: men backed faster medicine pipelines by two to one, women rejected them by roughly the same margin.

The verdict

Voters here backed cutting industrial electricity prices by 39 to 8, an 83% landslide, with support hardening rather than softening as the age brackets rise — every over-55 voter said yes.

The verdict

A dead heat: 25-25, exactly split down the middle on demanding Israel release Gaza hospital director Hussam Abu Safiya — but beneath the tie, a real fracture between 25-34s who backed the demand and 35-44s who resisted it.

The verdict

A near-unanimous 92% backed pushing defence spending to 3% of GDP, with every dissenting vote clustered among the youngest cohort on the platform.

The verdict

A rout: voters here rejected trading defence spending for welfare and growth by 29 votes to 5, an 85-point-plus margin that masks a sharp gender split beneath it.

The verdict

Yes carried it 59-41 on a chamber of 61, a comfortable but not crushing verdict that Shabana Mahmood has, in the platform's judgment, lost the plot on migration and protest policy.

The verdict

A resounding No: just 16% backed spending £50m on London flying taxis, with the 25-34 bracket the only pocket of real enthusiasm.

The verdict

Voters backed root-and-branch reform of police leadership by 76% to 24%, though the 35-44 bracket split almost down the middle even as every other cohort ran heavily in favour.